Reader Reports
Yesterday turned out to be very wham-bam-thank-you-Ma’am (in this image, I’m the ma’am) because, in addition to being 1/2 moved out of one house and into another, and in addition to being massively distracted by my nephew in the hospital, I got extensive feedback from 2 out of 3 committee members all at once, which I wasn’t prepared for. Lots of criticism, some praise, and a general sense of optimism (but that might all be in my head).
I had already scheduled a coffee date with one committee member, a woman who would appear to be matronly and nurturing, until she takes out her purple fountain pen and eviscerates whatever you’ve given her to read (And I mean eviscerate. My favorite thing she ever wrote on a piece of my writing was "This is lame—and confusing." But I have many, many runners-up: her comments on my work usually initiate with one positive declaration (for instance, "You have written a complex and compelling analysis of x, y and z," then followed by the word "unfortunately," then a long list of where I’m inadequate.). Don’t get me wrong: I love this professor, we work well together and have for years, and I treasure this relationship. She is "concerned" about where this is all headed, and she’s concerned that the later chapters, all built on the ones I’m now writing, won’t make any sense to anyone but me and my advisor. She could be totally correct; she would know better than I; that’s why she’s on my committee. While I kinda want to ask why no one brought up these problems, oh, two years ago, at this point I don’t have enough energy. If switching out some texts will help finish this fucking fucker, I’m happy to drop "Mysteries of Udolpho" just like Tyra dropped Paulina Porizkova.
A general warning: to anyone who is contemplating a trans-, meta-, or inter- dissertation that will compare and combine generally disparate fields, I suggest you not bother (this is not only from my own experience, but also from watching numerous other fools trying to tackle the Balkanized academy). Professors always talk about how much they value comparative work, but it’s rare that any comparative work ever pleases them; no one ever quite trusts comparative work. If you’re writing on, hypothetically, Homer’s "Odyssey" and the works of T.E. Lawrence (makes sense–Lawrence saw himself as an Odysseus figure and translated "Odyssey") you’d be working in Classics and 20th-century English. No one in Classics would trust that you really know Greek because you’ve frittered your time with modern prose, and no one from English would trust that you could really handle novelistic prose because you’re obviously over-aligned with dead langauges. Ugh. Please, write a boring, standard dissertation, then a book, and once you’re tenured write something trans-, meta- and inter-. I digress.
After yesterday’s meeting I got back to my office and in my mailbox was a large envelope from another committee member. I thought it was TAship applications for my summer course at first, and it took me a while to realize I was reading my own draft, covered with comments. I don’t know what to say about this committee member, other than she scares the shit out of me (and in this I’m not alone). She’s brilliant, the most attentive reader I’ve ever come across, and always able to offer trenchant assessments in a way that makes sense to me. That’s why I like to work with her. Surprisingly, she liked the chapter more than the other committee member, and she thought it worked overall. Her main advice: excise the intro and conclusion, revise the body as rigorously as possible, then later write a new conclusion and intro that reflect what I actually say. I can live with that.
The missing piece is, of course, my advisor and his assessment. I’m eager to hear what he thinks, since the chapter was written with him (and his signature, and later his letter to a hiring committee) in mind. He’s finishing two books, and at this moment he’s the keynote speaker at a very important conference in Crete. Perhaps his comments will be forthcoming?
- My Magical Dissertation | Time: 1:39 pm (UTC+8) No Comments »
